I read my copy of Computing magazine today and the comment section caught my eye. It was an article entitled “Focus Resources on what really matters” by Martin Butler, the basic premise is that IT has become caught up in a drive for efficiency at the expense of business success. In the current “economic climate” there is of course a natural tendency for cutting costs, corporate IT departments are usually large cost centres and thus are prime targets for cost savings.
It reminded me though of an article I read some years ago about the shift of IT to a utility function akin to the railways or electricity companies (IT Doesn’t Matter by Nicholas G. Carr published in the Harvard Business Review). The premise being that these businesses “open opportunities for forward-looking companies to gain strong competitive advantages. But as their availability increases and their cost decreases – as they become ubiquitous – they become commodity input”.
These are opposite views of IT, one as a continuing driver for business growth and one as a driver for business efficiency and cost savings.
Now, I’ve started reading Richard Susskind’s “The End of Lawyers?” and I’m currently at the point where he talks about “technology lag”. This is the lag between two forms of technology: data processing and knowledge processing. The former (data processing) he puts as the “use of technology to capture, distribute, reproduce and disseminate information.”, the later (knowledge processing) a “set of technologies that help us analyse, sift through and sort out the mountains of data that we have created and helps make them more manageable.”
Richard Susskind points out that we are between these two forms of technology, in law firms I agree. And I think Martin Butler’s view of the IT function is the one that will facilitate this move and be able to supply the “Knowledge Processing” in law firms. I’m afraid that Nicolas Carr’s IT function will give us very efficient and cost effective departments that are stuck in “Data Processing”! It’ll be interesting as we climb out of the recession which law firm IT departments become.
It will be Interesting.
Your thinking reminded me of these two articles (which I could not find anywhere except Google cache):
http://bit.ly/pbUzN
http://bit.ly/5IVTL
Perhaps we should spend less time thinking of ourselves as IT people, and more time acting as business people who happen to know a great deal about IT.
Great articles!
I agree with your last point regarding IT People we do need to do this. But I think that the “workers” (as the article refers to them) need to live up to their billing in the first article, that “the average worker becoming more tech savvy”. No more badge of honour “I don’t do IT” workers!
I feel that companies will be looking at IT primarily to help them grow. At the Enterprise 2.0 conference in Boston, system implementers were commenting on how C level executives want to see return on investment (or signs of it) within 6 months. I’ve been told by some in the industry that 10 years ago, this wasn’t the case. As this recession rolls on, I feel the key will be to do more with less. At best it means adoption of new technologies that help law firms grow, such as acquire new clients, without a heavy up front investment. Of course, any effort must be justified. Fortunately, getting new clients is a metric that is easy to measure.